Didn't he sell Alan's parents?

Oh, right.

Well, that’s not technically human trafficking. Ballon trafficking?

It's kinda a pointless distinction since all calling it balloon trafficking would do, is make it sound not at all like a severe crime, human trafficking gets the point across much better. Plus I see it as a similar case to that of kidnapping, the crime is called that regardless of if the person is a kid or not. So why make an even more pointless distinction between "human trafficking" and "sapient balloon trafficking"?

Yeah, makes sense.

@RubyDoesStuff would just “trafficking” work? I feel like that’s the best in all honesty.

BTW, I wasn't saying that the crime should be changed. It's fine like it is.

@Kodikos That wouldn't work since it doesn't make clear he trafficked sentient beings instead of objects.

It's better to leave human trafficking like @RubyDoesStuff said.

I don’t agree with calling it “human trafficking” but also I can’t think of anything better and I don’t wanna cause any more drama so I’ll leave it there.